Media Law

Entries categorized as ‘Anonymous Sources’

TV reporter ordered to hand over tapes of war protests

May 15, 2009 · 1 Comment

A reporter for a cable-access show in Chicago was ordered by a federal magistrate judge last week to hand over every video recording he made documenting anti-war protests from 2003 to 2005.

The reporter, Martin Conlisk, was subpoenaed by the city of Chicago during the course of its defense of a civil rights lawsuit filed by a local man who was arrested during a March 2005 anti-war protest. The protester, Andy Thayer, sued the city in 2007, alleging that his constitutional rights were violated by the arrest and claiming that the city’s policy of sending cops in riot gear to protests was a means to suppress speech.

Conlisk had been on the street corner filming the day Thayer was arrested and had testified in the man’s disorderly conduct criminal trial.

But in the lawsuit, the city’s subpoena requested much more than the video from the day of Thayer’s arrest. It ordered Conlisk to hand over all tapes and material that documented the planning and implementation of all anti-war protests in the city from March 2003 to the present, including everything on his computer hard drive. It also ordered him to testify about those videos.

In the April 30 ruling, the magistrate judge, Arlander Keys, refused to apply a reporter’s privilege, holding that courts in the Seventh Circuit have “rejected the notion of a federal reporter’s privilege.”

http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=10745

Categories: Anonymous Sources · privilege

USA Today Cuts Use of Anonymous Sources

February 20, 2008 · Leave a Comment

Anonymous sources can play an important role in breaking an explosive story, but that anonymity requires trust — in sources, but also the reporters themselves.

Last year, USA Today acknowledged that its former star reporter, Jack Kelley, fabricated quotes and entire stories. He hid some of his fictional anecdotes behind unnamed sources.Many newspapers have tried to tighten their rules allowing the use of confidential sources, but no major paper has taken a harder line than USA Today.http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4815420

Categories: Anonymous Sources · USA Today · confidential sources